Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collusion between business and government

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Collusion between business and government

Appears to be a POV fork from Hong Kong. I would merge back except the content is POV and having "Collusion between business and government" redirect to Hong Kong is kind of POV too. - Richfife 03:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Criticisms of Hong Kong's economic policy should be in that article, but such a povfork is unecessary, and such a title very unhelpful. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 04:12, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete irrelevant, not enough information to warrant its own article.--MonkBirdDuke 06:19, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the alleged examples are unverifiable given the number of other reasons beyond "collusion" that might explain the lack of a minimum wage etc. DWaterson 20:34, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough info per MonkBirdDuke. M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 01:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep important issue in HK, sparked multiple protests, debates in LegCo, extensive coverage in media, etc. 600000 hits in Google using the Chinese term and Hong Kong. The title is the standard term used to refer to this phenomenon. I added more info and links. WP 08:28, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply That may be true, but there needs to be a better place to put the information. If it can't go in the Hong Kong article, then it really can't go anywhere. - Richfife 02:22, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and merge into the appropriate Hong Kong article, Tewfik^Talk 03:34, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.